World Cup Final 2019: Possible simple equations of this tough match

Possible simple explanation of the difficult Super Over

 Chapter One: Could it be White?

Let's start with a ball of full length outside the legstamp. Could the ball be wide? Tough defense at the legside boundary, 4 from deep fine leg to long-on. Martin Guptill was probably expecting a short ball, clearing the frontfoot earlier. Maybe seeing that, Zafar Archer made the ball out of the legstump, so that it went and fell into the blockhole. Or Guptill wanted to take his foot in the ball line. But if he hadn't cleared the frontfoot beforehand, and Archer had been on that line, or hadn't moved Guptill's foot following the ball line, could the ball have been wide? The answer will never be known. This is the big difference between cricket and many other team-games - cricket is a game of 'discrete value' or 'discrete value', not 'continuous value' or 'continuous value'. One delivery therefore creates many possibilities, all at once. However, the equations of all possibilities are not always relevant. If that delivery is wide, New Zealand can tie the super over with 1 ball left. Archer could dot the next ball? Guptill could hold the nerves? If the fielders could get into all the circles, could Guptill evade them?

Chapter Two: Is Technology a Blessing or a Curse?

 How is the umpiring job? Go and ask the batsman or captain who is in doubt whether to take the review or not. For those 15 seconds they fall into a dilemma, maybe that's when they realize how much equation the umpires have to match in the space of a second or a fraction of a second, like their batting-bowling-fielding. Martin Guptill and Henry Nichols were doing just that. He was discussing and matching the equations.
2 seconds left in the timer. Guptill decided to review. Even if he didn't take it. Chris Oakes' ball landed under the knees of his sloping foot from where it fell, and with open eyes it seemed out. Guptill's review didn't work. He started Ashajagania in the World Cup final, but it was not the end. 2 seconds left in the timer. This time Nichols decided to review. Oaks' ball landed on the flap of his backfoot pad. Chester-Lee-Street was similarly dismissed by the same bowler, but did not take the review. Nile would have been successful. This time he did not make the mistake, but took a lot of time. Ball tracking showed again, it would go a little above the stumps. Nichols' run was then 8.

Catch?  

He did 49 more in his second life before being dismissed. Time did not rise in the timer. Ain Morgan went to the review. Umpire Kumar Dharmasena did not hear anything, he meant. But England are confident, they have got the wicket of New Zealand captain Ken Williamson. The last time England played a final was in 1992, when the opposition batted before the service. Javed Miandad has survived several 'close calls'. However, the English still believe that they could have got the wickets of Miandad earlier. When Derek Pringle reminded him of that, Miandad told him, "God is with me today." Ian Botham still said that the umpire dismissed him that day even though he did not have the ball in his bat. The Botham did not have a review in '92, it was the time of the Morgans playing after their retro jerseys. That review brought England the most valuable wicket in New Zealand.
Ross Taylor, however, did not get a chance to review. The match was going slowly, Taylor was settling down. This time too he went lbw while playing the trademark shuffle with Mark Wood's ball, but the ball was on the ni-roll. In the semi-final, the New Zealand hero did not get a chance to do much in the final. Of course, he could have got the chance, if Guptill had not gone to the review with 2 seconds left. Shown ball tracking, the ball would go over the stumps. 9 seconds in the timer. Why Williamson took the review. The ball from Trent Bolt's over the wicket was coming in, the umpire did not give out to Jason Roy. The wicket is the umpires call, which means Roy would have to return to zero if he was out on the field. Roy finally made 18.

Chapter Three: Loss of Weight Loss or Loss of Balance 

Maiden in 3 overs, with 1 wicket. That could be the equation. Lord's wicket was not easy for batting that day, not even in Rantara. New Zealand could have gone from the end of the first Powerplay to a stage when they could have put more pressure on England. They held India in such a condition in the semi-finals. However, Colin D'Grandom could not take the easy catch Johnny Bairstore. After getting life for 16 runs, he was dismissed for 36 runs. Lucky Ferguson, however, took the catch of Ain Morgan brilliantly. Ian Smith sat down to comment, saying it was one of the best catches in history under pressure. However, the TV umpire was approached but he could not find a reason to cancel the catch. Ferguson was quite confident when he took the catch. However, Tim Southee was shaky when he caught Jos Butler. At first he misunderstood the trajectory of the ball and moved to his left, then he covered the right side and took the catch with a dive. Saudi was not in the XI, he could have become one of the 'villains' if he missed the catch. Went to the forest super-sub. Before Butler's wicket, the match was leaning towards England, which could have been missed if Saudi had missed.
Tom Latham, however, made the mistake of taking his own position in the beginning to catch Oaks, but he did it at the last minute. Saudi could. Latham could too. Only Trent Bolt could not. Need 22 runs from 9 balls, Liam Plunkett was out in the previous ball. Jimmy Neesham's ball was picked up by Ben Stokes, Long-on Bolt. Carlos Brathwaite's dream was shattered by this Bolt in the group stage, Bolt jumped in the long on and took a great catch. This time too he took it well, meaning he was handcuffed. Going to put the left foot, everything became turbulent. He lost his balance while handling the weight, so much so that not everything is said. If Bolt's left foot was in the same place where the right foot was dropped, there would be no problem. After that he could not handle the load - even though Martin Guptill was in front, so there was an option of partnership catch by throwing the ball. Bolt did, but that's what happened before. His left leg fell on the boundary cushion. Guptill got the ball he was throwing, but then he raised his hands instead of cheering - six. Stokes took the single with the next ball. Archer was bold with his next ball. 15 runs required in last 8 balls. But the equation could have been 2 balls earlier - England need 22 runs from 8 balls, the remaining 2 wickets, no Stokes. Stokes remained, who would hit two sixes in the next over. That means two sixes will come from his bat.

Not a catch it’s six!   

Chapter Four: Miracle Six (Miracle Five)

The first ball could have been single. At least the strike could have changed. Stokes and Adil Rashid both left the crease but changed their minds at the last minute. Stokes also gave the next ball to Dot. The third says six. So is the fourth. However, these six are one of the worst in the history of cricket. That six timing took the word to another height. Stokes seemed to be running for his life. Dived at the last moment. As Martin Guptill tried to make up for his World Cup run by fielding, the match-fixing moment with India in the semi-finals came with his direct throw. Of course, Guptill was fine then. This time at Deep Midwicket. But from there he also hit the stumps. Maybe it could have broken the stump directly. Stokes came in between, the trees at the corner of the road appeared in front of the night coach in the foggy night. At the last moment the skilled driver turned the steering wheel of the bus, but in this case Stokes did not see the ball coming from the opposite direction. Guptill's throw went to his bat leading to the popping crease. Ball-bat collision. Then it changed direction and ran with the third man, as if to prove the law of motion of the beginning of physics. It was as if Stokes had played another shot. Colin D'Grandom ran behind the ball in vain. Latham rested his gloves on his face. Williamson stretched out his arms as if to say, "What happened?" Not sure who says what. Guptill's face is not going to be translated. Stokes sits up and puts his hands up, he's not running. He is not responsible for what happened.

Contrast: Stokes sits up with both hands up. The audience cheered with their hands raised behind their backs.

If Guptill had caught the ball a little earlier, would have thrown a little earlier and later, would have thrown a little back and forth, Stokes would have dived a little earlier and later, then maybe this crazy incident would not have happened. But if that is the case, then the spectators who have passed their lives by timing will not be able to see the strangest scene of cricket-timing. If Stokes hadn't been run-out, but if that hadn't been an overthrow, England would have needed six runs off the last two balls, meaning a boundary. Now we need 2 to 3. In fact, England needed 4 runs. When Guptill throws, that is, when the ball is out of his hands, Stokes and Rashid do not cross each other at the crease. As a result, their second run should not be added to the boundary from that throw according to the playing condition of cricket. Strike-side umpire Kumar Dharmasena spoke to Marai Erasmus, who is on the field, and made the decision without noticing it. However, he later said that every match official had heard his conversation with Erasmus, but no one could catch the mistake. If they hadn't made that mistake, England would have needed 4 runs in the last 2 balls, Rashid would have been in Stokes' place in the strwent

Chapter five: 2 runs in 3 ball and 3 runs in 2 ball

 With all his might, Stokes went deep into the crease and played. Bolt's yorker moved out of the legstump to play, losing balance while playing. Once in the fielding field, he had a strain in his leg muscles, and in such a state of the match, Stokes looked like a fighter who could not accept anything even after losing everything. Rashid was waiting for Stokes, also in doubles after singles. But Stokes couldn’t afford that late start. Rashid was run out at the non-strike end. However, after breaking the stumps, Bolt remembered that he could have thrown at the other end without breaking the stumps, then Stokes could have been out. In that case England would have needed 2 off 1 ball, the last batsman Mark Wood could have been on strike. Bolt fouled the last ball on the legstump. Stokes could have tried bigger shots. The ball could rise in the sky. As Misbah-ul-Haq tried to play Joginder Sharma's ball in the 2006 T20 World Cup. But with 3 runs from 2 balls, Stokes remembered Bangladesh. Bangladesh, Mushfiqur Rahim and Mahmudullah lost two balls in a row in the 2016 T20 World Cup even though they needed two runs. Stokes did not want to take the risk. Wanted to at least take the match to the super over. Stokes could not think so. He could not have thought of that match in Bangladesh, or anything like that. Stokes could pick up and kill. Could be out. It could have been six or four. Or something else. Bolt caught the ball from a distance in the previous run-out, this time from quite close. Whether he broke the stump with his hand before catching the ball was also in doubt. The match could have ended with Stokes or Bolt. This award-winning Williamson film could have been different.

This award-winning Williamson film could have been different

Chapter Six: The Interval of Joy and Disappointment

Jason Roy could have been run-out if Jason Roy had taken the ball properly. He could have been in the place of 5 runs from 3 balls. Colin D'Grandom, the last batsman in the Super Over, could have come to the crease. Or Roy could have thrown the next ball at the strike end, wherever Joss Butler wanted. Maybe he said that England would have had a chance to run out Nisham. Or Archer could have made a direct throw with the next ball. It could have been a stump, Nisham could have been out again for a single, or New Zealand could have got a run from an over-throw. Archer did not throw. For example, Stokes refrained from playing shots at the end of his innings. Roy could have bowled the last ball of the super over like the previous two. Or could have thrown at the non-strike end, towards the archer, where Nisham was comparatively ahead. Joss Butler initially stood behind the stumps, watching the direction of the throw and moving forward in front of the stumps. He could wait until the ball came to him. In that case, Guptill might get extra time. Could have reached the crease. After a while, the small butler could have bowed down in despair. But Guptill had to do that. Nisham or Oaks came and could only give him consolation.

Martin Guptil super over of the icc World cup 2019, Ce    

Dharmasena could not give the ball wide. The first ball of the super over was bowled by Archer. Ian Smith was saying in the commentary, it is definitely wide. Ian Bishop said, it depends on which side you are on. Even if it is wide at the beginning or not, it may not be discussed at all. If the England-New Zealand final had not been as it was. The game of ‘discrete value’ says that in the dataset of probability of almost every ball there are many possibilities, many different directions of many equations. However, they are not relevant. But the match that is like that World Cup final at Lord's on July 14, 2019, the match that has to be resorted to like a miraculous word to describe, is the match that may be tried to match the possible equation and its direction. Stories that do not become relevant then. Attachment: England won the toss and elected to field. If the number of boundaries was the same, only the number of boundaries in the original innings would be seen. Even then, if it was equal, it would have been the 'countback' of the Super Over run. In that case, from the 6th valid delivery to the 1st valid delivery, the scoring of the two teams was seen, the ones who had more runs before, won. However, after this World Cup final, the ICC changed the rules for counting boundaries. Now, if the Super Over is tied in the semi-finals and finals of the ICC tournament, the Super Over will continue until one team runs more. The ICC will keep this rule in every tie match of the tournament as the World Cup final is also a super over. Before that it was just for the knock-out episode. If this rule had been in place before, New Zealand would have had another chance.